Resignation

Oct 7, 2009

Articles

Can an employer deduct monies from an employee’s salary if the employee
fails to give proper notice of resignation? Does verbal resignation suffice or
should it be in writing? What if an employee resigns to avoid disciplinary
action – can the employer reject the resignation and proceed with the
disciplinary action? Can an employer offer resignation as an alternative to
disciplinary action?

Both the Labour Relations Act and the Basic Conditions of Employment Act are
relevant to these questions. The BCEA (s37) provides that notice of termination of
employment by both the employer and the employee must be in writing and be of
certain duration (i.e., 1 week during the first 6 months of employment, and so on).
What if the employee resigns without proper notice when a disciplinary process is
pending, can the employer continue with the process? The answer is yes: the
employee’s resignation alone does not end the contract – the contract continues until
the date on which it would have ended if proper notice had been given (the ‘usual
termination date’), or until the date on which the employer elects to end the contract,
if that happens sooner. The choice whether to allow the contract to ‘run out’ or to
terminate it earlier by way of a disciplinary process belongs to the employer. Of
course, if the employee is no longer available for work, he/she is not entitled to claim
salary from the date of their desertion, which is what resignation without notice
essentially amounts to. If the employer elects to keep the contract alive and to hold a
hearing, the employee should be invited to attend the hearing, but if s/he does not,
the process can continue in his/her absence. If the employee is found guilty of
serious misconduct, the employer may at that point end the contract by dismissing
the employee.

The BCEA further provides (s34) that deductions may not be made from an
employee’s remuneration except in the very specific circumstances set out in that
section. Unless there is a written agreement with the employee to do so, the
employer cannot, without a written agreement to that effect, lawfully deduct any
monies from the employee for failing to give proper notice. It is advisable for
employers to include a provision in new contracts of employment to the effect that
employees who fail to give proper notice will forfeit an amount equal to the amount
the employee would have earned during the required notice period. In the absence
of such a clause, the employer’s only option is to try to obtain the employee’s
consent to a deduction, or else sue the employee civilly for the damages suffered as
a result of the employee’s failure to give proper notice. The expense involved in
doing so probably won’t make it the employer’s while.

Is it advisable to offer an employee the option of resigning instead of facing
disciplinary action? There are three considerations here. The first is an ethical one.
Say, for example, that an employer allows an employee who faces allegations of
dishonesty to resign. This may send a wrong message to future employers about the
circumstances of the employee’s departure. There is less of a problem if the offer of
resignation stems not from the employee’s misconduct, but his or her poor
performance, ill health or incompatibility. The second problem is a two-part legal one:
letting one employee go as easily as this can create a problem in terms of
consistency when future incidents of dishonesty arise. It may be difficult, if not
impossible, for an employer to convince an arbitrator that there was any justification
in letting one person gets off scot-free while another was subjected to a ‘zero
tolerance’ approach.

The other legal difficulty is that an employee who feels compelled to resign might
allege that’s/he has been constructively dismissed. However, provided the employer
otherwise has a basis for dismissing the employee (e.g., serious misconduct or
continued poor performance) it will be difficult for the employee to prove that s/he
had no option to resign or that the employer acted unlawfully or unfairly in suggesting
resignation (these being essential ingredients for a successful constructive dismissal
claim).

As a point of departure, an offer for an employee to resign should not be made
unless there is compelling evidence of serious misconduct or there exists another
possible ground for dismissal (e.g., incapacity). The employer should not offer the
employee the option of resignation where there is doubt about whether the
employee’s choice would be truly voluntary – as a rule of thumb; one should ask if all
things considered; the employee ultimately benefits from the resignation.

For the employee, too, resignation is not a course that should be followed without
careful consideration. It not only means that unemployment benefits are forfeited, but
prevents the employee from claiming that an unfair dismissal had taken place, save
for the exceptional instance of constructive dismissal.

Barney Jordaan
Maserumule Consulting

This information is published for general information purposes and is not intended to constitute legal advice and should not be construed as such. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular situation. Maserumule will accept no responsibility for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this publication. Consent must be obtained from Maserumule before the information provided herein is reproduced in any way. No person shall have any claim of any nature whatsoever arising out of, or in connection with, the information provided herein against Maserumule and/or any of its personnel.

LATEST RESOURCES

Update – Union Representation in Litigation Disputes

In this article we address the age-old question of whether an aggrieved employee may be represented in litigation proceedings by any trade union. The question was finally answered by the Constitutional Court in its judgement delivered on the 21st day of June 2024

read more