This information is published for general information purposes and is not intended to constitute legal advice and should not be construed as such. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular situation. Maserumule Corporate Employment Law will accept no responsibility for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this publication. Consent must be obtained from Maserumule Corporate Employment Law before the information provided herein is reproduced in any way. No person shall have any claim of any nature whatsoever arising out of, or in connection with, the information provided herein against Maserumule Corporate Employment Law and/or any of its personnel.
In today’s high-pressure work environments, performance pressure and expectations are often stringent, particularly in industries requiring tight deadlines and large-scale project execution. Explore how the Samson v CCMA case clarifies the line between poor incapacity: performance and misconduct — and what employers must prove before disciplining staff for operational failures.
Retrenchment, when used genuinely and transparently, is a lawful mechanism for employers to navigate economic challenges and adapt to changing business needs. However, when used as a smokescreen to disguise retaliatory dismissals, it becomes a tool of exploitation, undermining the very essence of fairness and justice entrenched in South African labour law.
In the reportable judgment of National Lotteries Commission v Mafonjo and Another, the Labour Court addressed what it described as an “incongruent ruling” on sanction. The Court set aside the chairperson’s decision and substituted it with an order of dismissal with immediate effect.
The concept of gross negligence in employment law is significant because, like dishonesty, it can irreparably damage the employment relationship. However, its application is context-dependent and must be evaluated based on workplace policies, industry standards, and the nature of the employee’s duties
Sexual harassment, including acts such as those committed by a peeping tom, is a form of unfair discrimination based on the grounds of sex, gender, and/or sexual orientation. It has been characterised by the Labour Appeal Court as “the most heinous misconduct that plagues a workplace”