Can an employee get dismissed fairly for racial profiling? Not Always

Aug 7, 2017

Articles

SAEWA obo Bester v Rustenburg Platinum Mine and Another (JA45/16) [2017] ZALAC 23 (3 May 2017)

BACKGROUND

“On 28 May 2013, the Rustenburg Platinum Mine (“RPM”) dismissed Mr. Meyer Bester on the grounds of insubordination and making certain racial remarks. On 24 April 2013, Mr. Ben Sedumedi and other colleagues held a safety meeting. While the meeting was in progress, Bester entered the office and raised an issue falling within the scope of Sedumedi’s authority relating to parking in the workplace.

Two weeks prior to the date of dismissal, Bester found a large 4×4 vehicle parked in the parking bay adjacent to the one that Sedumedi had allocated to him. This resulted in Bester having difficulty to reverse park in his parking bay, although it was not impossible for him to do so. He feared that he might scratch and bump the other party’s vehicle. On numerous occasions Bester attempted to take the matter up with Sedumedi in an effort to arrange for the vehicle of the other party to be parked in one of the other available bays. All the attempts which were made by Bester to resolve the issue with Sedumedi failed.

On 24 April 2013, Bester walked into Sedumedi’s office, pointed a finger at Sedumedi and said, in a loud and aggressive manner, that Sedumedi must ‘verwyder daar die swartman se voertuig’ (from the parking bay) otherwise he would take the matter up with management. RPM charged Bester with two acts of misconduct being those of insubordination and making a racial remark by using the word ‘swartman’ to refer to a fellow employee when he requested that he move his vehicle. On 23 May 2013, the chairperson of the disciplinary enquiry found Bester guilty of both of the two acts of misconduct and recommended the sanction of dismissal and, on 28 May 2013, RPM dismissed Bester.”

Download full article

Featured image credit: http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Sz_AAL0N5R0/maxresdefault.jpj

 

 

This information is published for general information purposes and is not intended to constitute legal advice and should not be construed as such. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular situation. Maserumule will accept no responsibility for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this publication. Consent must be obtained from Maserumule before the information provided herein is reproduced in any way. No person shall have any claim of any nature whatsoever arising out of, or in connection with, the information provided herein against Maserumule and/or any of its personnel.

Name Calling
LATEST RESOURCES

Update – Union Representation in Litigation Disputes

In this article we address the age-old question of whether an aggrieved employee may be represented in litigation proceedings by any trade union. The question was finally answered by the Constitutional Court in its judgement delivered on the 21st day of June 2024

read more